Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF (all builds)
Memory	16.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181001
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '18 at 23:01
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800 10,440 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 61.5 1-Core 106 2-Core 222 70% 130 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 688 64% 534 Pts	64-Core 1,856 115% 1,856 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 3201) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.9% Poor	Lighting 37.1 Reflection 35.3 Parallax 27.8 30% 33.4 fps	MRender 39.4 Gravity 34.3 Splatting 34.2 29% 36 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 218 237 238 246 247 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Read 480 Write 447 Mixed 392 SusWrite 256 88% 394 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 28.5 111% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 217 186% 270 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 95%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 524GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 123 122 124 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 27.5 Write 112 Mixed 32 SusWrite 122 53% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.3 94% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 108%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 1.5TB 1,258 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 397GB free Firmware: 0302 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 97 97 97 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 75.7 Write 59.1 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 97.1 52% 70.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.6 164% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 65%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB 7,384 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 918GB free, PID 25fa Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	44.2% Average	Read 70.3 Write 78.3 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 79.1 99% 72.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.7 211% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 679 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	MC Read 24 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 23.3 63% 22.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 17.5 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 123 32% 123 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

CPU
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	86x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	44x
Ryzen TR 2920XAMDBench 81%, 3,902 samples	39x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	17x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	15x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	14x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	5x
F4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 128%, 25 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 94%, 8,912 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $1,053

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16