Toshiba Satellite L855

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Toshiba Satellite L855 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130422
Uptime	57.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '18 at 16:27
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 84.6 2-Core 134 65% 103 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 361 38% 304 Pts	64-Core 420 26% 420 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M 7,895 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB22) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	5.1% Terrible	Lighting 6.67 Reflection 6.5 Parallax 5.34 5% 6.17 fps	MRender 5.71 Gravity 4.77 Splatting 5.74 4% 5.41 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.1% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,060 Write 4,603 Mixed 4,538 1,056% 4,734 MB/s	4K Read 444 4K Write 202 4K Mixed 248 1,096% 298 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 491 DQ Mixed 369 298% 416 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 21GB free Firmware: DXT0AB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 240 231 167 134 173 MB/s Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.4% Good	Read 258 Write 238 Mixed 148 SusWrite 197 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 21.7 102% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 31.7 70% 142 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 10,168 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 19.1 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.7 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 66.1 61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite L855 Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L855

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	73x
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	43x
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	23x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	104x
Radeon HD 7600MAMDBench 4%, 7,895 samples	83x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	6x
MX500 500GBCrucial $49Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	13x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	10x
M471B5173BH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,461 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $448

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16