Asus Q170M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Q170M-C  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '18 at 15:02
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$130
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 111
2-Core 223
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 439
59% 439 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Lighting 72.8
Reflection 74.1
Parallax 64.2
59% 70.4 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 68.3
Splatting 69.9
57% 69 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$61
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 403 402 399 406 406 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 452
Mixed 343
SusWrite 392
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 31
151% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 277
221% 311 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 103%
Great: 119%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 157 155 158 159 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 146
Write 150
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 157
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 96%
Fujitsu MHW2120BH 120GB-$32
4GB free
Firmware: 00000012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 18 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 18.7
Write 20.5
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 19.5
14% 19 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11%
Great: 33%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
11GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 158
Write 42
Mixed 25
SusWrite 40.3
69% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD2 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.7% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16.5
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q170M-C Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Q170M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $355
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback