HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory44.8 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 22 '18 at 02:57
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 166
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 642
57% 484 Pts
64-Core 792
49% 792 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80% Very good
Lighting 99
Reflection 111
Parallax 91.1
81% 100 fps
MRender 95
Gravity 93.5
Splatting 98.5
79% 95.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 360 367 369 370 369 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 375
Write 369
Mixed 306
SusWrite 366
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 30.3
98% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 152
159% 264 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 116%
HP EG0600JETKA 600GB
435GB free
Firmware: HPD4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 60 59 60 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 173
Write 56
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 59.2
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
169% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 114%
HP EG0600JETKA 600GB
559GB free
Firmware: HPD4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 60 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 208
Write 57.7
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 60.2
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HUA72101 1TB
808GB free
Firmware: AB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 82 82 82 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
47% Average
Read 81.3
Write 85.9
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 82.3
53% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47%
Great: 47%
Hitachi HUA72101 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: A70M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 82 82 82 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
47% Average
Read 81.1
Write 81.3
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 82.3
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M... 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 25.8
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback