HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory44.3 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 22 '18 at 01:09
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 158
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 575
54% 450 Pts
64-Core 781
48% 781 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.6% Very good
Lighting 95.3
Reflection 107
Parallax 91.2
78% 97.7 fps
MRender 95.2
Gravity 92.9
Splatting 95.3
77% 94.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 359 368 375 375 373 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 377
Write 375
Mixed 308
SusWrite 370
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 29.4
100% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 153
160% 264 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 116%
HP EG0600JETKA 600GB
546GB free
Firmware: HPD4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 52 50 45 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 62.7
Write 34.3
Mixed 34.6
SusWrite 45.6
33% 44.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 114%
HP EG0600JETKA 600GB
559GB free
Firmware: HPD4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 207
Write 57.5
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 60.6
73% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 114%
HP MM1000FBFVR 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: HPD8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 40 26 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 110
Write 39.1
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 36.9
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 50%
Hitachi HUA72101 1TB
808GB free
Firmware: AB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 48 17 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.04% Terrible
Read 8.7
Write 10.7
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 22.8
10% 13 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 9.04%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M... 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 24.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.3
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback