Samsung 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '16 at 21:22
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2367M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 74.1
1-Core 36.1
2-Core 70.2
41% 60.1 Pts
4-Core 93.4
8-Core 93.7
12% 93.6 Pts
64-Core 93.3
6% 93.3 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0C7) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.57% Terrible
Lighting 1.73
Reflection 2.35
Parallax 1.22
1% 1.77 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 1
Splatting 3.22
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.57%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 503
Write 398
Mixed 415
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 15.7
80% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 74.2
DQ Write 79.5
DQ Mixed 39.8
40% 64.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 124%
Sandisk i100 16GB
12GB free
Firmware: 11.00.04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 226
Write 57.6
Mixed 92.6
27% 126 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 4.2
29% 8.42 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 7.22
DQ Mixed 4.92
6% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-DJ-F Kingston 9905428-186.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.8% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback