HP 550-154na

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP 550-154na (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B47
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150924
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 21 '18 at 15:58
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 90.6 2-Core 187 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 316 37% 287 Pts	64-Core 338 21% 338 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 40.6 Reflection 31.5 Parallax 37.7 33% 36.6 fps	Gravity 38.2 Splatting 36.3 33% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000H1 128GB 2,337 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT09H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 25 25 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 345 Write 30.7 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 24.9 24% 113 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 17.8 75% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 349 DQ Write 31.9 DQ Mixed 34.4 65% 138 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 79%
Asmedia ASM1153E 250GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 140GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 343 351 295 272 272 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Read 359 Write 337 Mixed 336 SusWrite 314 76% 336 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 33.7 4K Mixed 27.5 88% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 81.6 72% 109 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 72%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 366GB free Firmware: MS2OA7C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 117 135 136 137 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 142 Write 135 Mixed 31 SusWrite 133 80% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 107%
WD My Passport 259F 2TB 3,542 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1.5TB free, PID 259f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 110 110 112 113 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 100 Write 102 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 111 125% 92.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.C16 2x8GB 4,052 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	57.2% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 18.8 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 16.9 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16