Mitac_ DN2800MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMitac_ DN2800MT  (all builds)
MotherboardMiTAC PD11TI
Memory1.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '16 at 17:58
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N2800
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Memory 42
1-Core 8.1
2-Core 16
18% 22 Pts
4-Core 20.6
8-Core 24.4
3% 22.5 Pts
64-Core 25.5
2% 25.5 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3600
Device(1071 0733)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.8.1091
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.45% Terrible
Lighting 0.83
Reflection 0.65
Parallax 0.59
1% 0.69 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.45%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 525 Series mSATA 120GB-$119
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LLLi Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.1% Below average
Read 251
Write 144
Mixed 163
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 13.6
56% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 58.3
DQ Write 46.8
DQ Mixed 26.4
27% 43.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x 0x 0x 3GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 3.4
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 2.5
7% 2.57 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback