Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 Eight-Core 744 User benchmarks, average bench 77% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 72.3 1-Core 121 2-Core 223 77% 139 Pts	4-Core 414 8-Core 757 70% 586 Pts	64-Core 1,125 70% 1,125 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1642 3F86) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.73 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	7.15% Terrible	Lighting 9 Reflection 7.88 Parallax 9.25 7% 8.71 fps	MRender 11 Gravity 7.33 Splatting 7.17 7% 8.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.15% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L7 256GB 1,318 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT04L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 308 311 310 312 311 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Read 461 Write 450 Mixed 397 SusWrite 320 92% 407 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 71.9 4K Mixed 46.8 153% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 37.6 DQ Write 97.4 DQ Mixed 49.4 43% 61.5 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB 29,586 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	MC Read 37.7 MC Write 35 MC Mixed 29.8 98% 34.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.6 SC Write 28.4 SC Mixed 26.4 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 96.2 42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16