Dell PowerEdge R530

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell PowerEdge R530
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R530  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180523
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateDec 18 '18 at 08:13
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4
CPU1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 52.3
1-Core 55.4
2-Core 111
43% 72.9 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 444
39% 333 Pts
64-Core 890
55% 890 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC H730 Mini 119GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.29
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,929
Write 2,955
Mixed 2,961
660% 2,948 MB/s
4K Read 94.1
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 91.8
309% 92.5 MB/s
DQ Read 426
DQ Write 387
DQ Mixed 394
299% 402 MB/s
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2.5TB
399GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 9.8 16 9.1 9.3 8.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50% Above average
Read 372
Write 312
Mixed 263
SusWrite 10.1
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 21.5
83% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 193
147% 204 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50%
Great: 27%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1.5TB
554GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 18 17 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA41GR7AFR8N-TF 4x8GB
4 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.4% Above average
MC Read 27
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 16.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 13.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge R530 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback