PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | EVGA Classified SR-2 (all builds) |
Memory | 20.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110825 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Dec 17 '18 at 06:23 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
|
54.3%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
PwrHis(1787 2317) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
OCZ ARC 100 480GB-$70
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 193 192 186 159 185 MB/s
|
48%
Average
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
665GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 127 127 127 127 MB/s
|
74.9%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 1TB
124GB free, PID 5031
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 24 24 24 MB/s
|
11%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra 125GB
105GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 16 19 18 19 19 MB/s
|
12.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905402-420.A00LF 12x2GB
12 of 18 slots used
24GB DIMM 1333 MHz
|
41.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples | 14x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56801stBench 71%, 2,389 samples | 5x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
R9 Fury-XAMD $781Bench 59%, 8,241 samples | 6x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 5x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 16% - Very poor | Total price: $922 |