| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock AB350M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170713 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 16 '18 at 06:27 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.8%
Good
|
68% 121 Pts
|
53% 428 Pts
|
34% 544 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 22F9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.6%
Above average
|
53% 70.5 fps
|
49% 60.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 573 327 321 326 330 330 MB/s
|
182%
Outstanding
|
232% 1,044 MB/s
|
195% 68.5 MB/s
|
511% 706 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown CL15-17-17 D4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2934 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.3%
Above average
|
52% 18 GB/s
|
46% 16 GB/s
|
41% 98.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,422 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $88
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 298x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 125x |
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 103x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 145x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 121x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 98x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $463 |