ADD TO PC
BUILD

Supermicro H8QM3

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Supermicro H8QM3 (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro H8QM3
Memory	13.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101210
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 14 '18 at 21:08
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	BIH-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Six-Core AMD Opteron 8431 7 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 4 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	33.7% Below average	Memory 41.1 1-Core 35.5 2-Core 70.7 30% 49.1 Pts	4-Core 142 8-Core 282 25% 212 Pts	64-Core 848 52% 848 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% XFX(1682 3001) 3GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.8.1 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Lighting 48.1 Reflection 31.9 Parallax 59.8 39% 46.6 fps	MRender 30.4 Gravity 47.2 Splatting 40 32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 240GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 49 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 587 Write 121 Mixed 139 SusWrite 63.5 49% 227 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 10.9 4K Mixed 13.2 32% 10.2 MB/s	DQ Read 18.9 DQ Write 17.4 DQ Mixed 22 16% 19.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 103%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 34GB free Firmware: 3B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 105 104 104 104 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 102 Write 99.2 Mixed 64.1 SusWrite 103 68% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 62%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 18GB free Firmware: 3B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 105 105 108 105 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	54% Above average	Read 81.1 Write 80.7 Mixed 58.7 SusWrite 107 60% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 62%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46 4,063 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 70GB free Firmware: 0-50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 56 57 57 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Read 37.9 Write 42.2 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 56.7 31% 41.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 21 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 6.3 17% 5.87 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6 14% 4.97 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback