Dell PowerEdge R710

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive92.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory72GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 72GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell PowerEdge R710
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R710  (all builds)
Memory53.7 GB free of 72 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '18 at 00:10
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5680
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 163
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 627
58% 481 Pts
64-Core 1,301
80% 1,301 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 735 MHz, MLim: 775 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 6% Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC H700 999GB
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 458 451 471 470 460 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 423
Write 480
Mixed 278
SusWrite 463
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 31.1
106% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 288
225% 310 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 00AD00B380AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 00AD00B380AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 00AD00B380AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 00AD00B380AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 00AD00B380AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 00AD00B380AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 00AD00B380AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9... 72GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.9% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 10.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge R710 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback