Hp-pavilion NY732AA-AKL p6275l

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHp-pavilion NY732AA-AKL p6275l  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN ETON
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '18 at 15:31
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 42.7
2-Core 81
43% 65.2 Pts
4-Core 83.2
8-Core 83.1
11% 83.1 Pts
64-Core 82.9
5% 82.9 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210
Device(1B0A 9045) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.44 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.65 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
318GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM4OA57A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 60 61 65 70 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 55.2
Write 71.8
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 63.9
43% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 GU512303EP0202 4GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.6
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback