Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '18 at 06:05
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7920X-$250
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 80.8
1-Core 135
2-Core 276
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 1,080
97% 820 Pts
64-Core 2,279
141% 2,279 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Asus(1043 8660) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3650 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 164
Parallax 168
140% 168 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 149
Splatting 108
118% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 886 638 638 637 623 587 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,958
Write 1,659
Mixed 712
SusWrite 668
278% 1,249 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 56.7
213% 89.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,046
DQ Write 1051
DQ Mixed 883
709% 993 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 231%
Great: 254%
Intel 530 Series 180GB
95GB free
Firmware: DC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 198 197 196 199 199 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 332
Write 202
Mixed 227
SusWrite 194
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 20
75% 17.4 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 82%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
94GB free
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 486 483 476 475 354 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 465
Mixed 418
SusWrite 458
103% 455 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 42.6
171% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 54.6
MC Mixed 34.2
122% 42.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 10.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 107%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X299-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback