Asrock AB350M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock AB350M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181005
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '18 at 00:32
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Memory 79.5 1-Core 120 2-Core 231 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 459 8-Core 707 72% 583 Pts	64-Core 933 58% 933 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB; ZT-P10510A-10L, ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1050 Ti CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.22 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.7% Below average	Lighting 39.4 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 37.6 32% 36 fps	MRender 38.7 Gravity 38.2 Splatting 36.6 31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 319 319 319 318 318 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 489 Mixed 465 SusWrite 326 101% 449 MB/s	4K Read 47.8 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 61.9 206% 70.9 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 363 274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 126%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 873GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 176 175 178 179 177 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 178 Mixed 108 SusWrite 177 118% 161 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.7 178% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.2% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 14.4 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 15.4 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 81.5 49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $88

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	296x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	125x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	102x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	144x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	120x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	96x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	50x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	38x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	31x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	43x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	28x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $460

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16