Acer Predator G3620

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G3620  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G3620
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130430
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 09 '18 at 18:19
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 182
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 339
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.6% Very good
Lighting 90.2
Reflection 109
Parallax 95.8
74% 98.5 fps
MRender 91.2
Gravity 86.9
Splatting 100
77% 92.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 116 3.1 36 3.2 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 429
Write 273
Mixed 306
SusWrite 37.7
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 24.8
95% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 2.3
66% 161 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 87%
PNY CS900 120GB SSD
230GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 145 148 145 146 148 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 145
Write 106
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 146
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
4% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.8% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3620 Builds (Compare 391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G3620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback