Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '16 at 03:22
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 129
2-Core 248
90% 158 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 642
70% 555 Pts
64-Core 646
40% 646 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 23
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 28.3
19% 26.9 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 31.4
21% 25.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 399
Mixed 386
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 37
152% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 94
90% 140 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 185
Mixed 95.4
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.35
99% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 103%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$89
788GB free
Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 78.2
Write 96.3
Mixed 89.5
66% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.5
117% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 70%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
2TB free, PID 2567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 179
Write 154
Mixed 146
200% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.21
63% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
67.1% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 20.3
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 22
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 51.5
78% 51.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-UD3H Builds (Compare 1,571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $680
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback