Asus P8Z68-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z68-V (all builds)
Memory	7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110509
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '18 at 10:11
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	56%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 92.4 1-Core 103 2-Core 202 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 309 42% 311 Pts	64-Core 302 19% 302 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Lighting 69.3 Reflection 68.4 Parallax 58.9 56% 65.6 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 66.1 Splatting 67.8 56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54 24,309 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 49 49 50 56 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 51.3 Write 37.8 Mixed 31 SusWrite 45.9 30% 41.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 145% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 58%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 50GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 27 24 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Read 60.7 Write 30 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 27 32% 42 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 63%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 157GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 49 30 46 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 16.5 Write 36.5 Mixed 34 SusWrite 44.5 24% 32.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 12GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	41.8% Average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 12.1 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12.9 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 63.3 63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z68-V Builds (Compare 829 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V - $390

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	248x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	243x
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	83x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	61x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	54x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	45x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $137Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	28x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	24x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	21x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $795

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369