Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming K4  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '18 at 09:08
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 119
2-Core 237
78% 143 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 740
74% 603 Pts
64-Core 912
56% 912 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1440 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.9% Good
Lighting 78
Reflection 71.5
Parallax 104
64% 84.6 fps
MRender 71.9
Gravity 74.1
Splatting 60.8
56% 68.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 392 293 144 149 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 457
Write 462
Mixed 384
SusWrite 250
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 34.9
120% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 305
219% 277 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 95%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
249GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 470 470 445 273 273 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 474
Mixed 455
SusWrite 394
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 50.4
169% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 362
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 113%
Great: 129%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
140GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 71 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 38.5
Mixed 68
SusWrite 71
45% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$299
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 28.5
84% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $730
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback