HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive20.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory44.2 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateDec 08 '18 at 19:39
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 120
56% 89.3 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 401
40% 326 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
HP(103C 0780) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 311.66
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 24 73 115 14 13 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.8% Poor
Read 161
Write 86.7
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 61.4
21% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 8
31% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 17.6
DQ Write 33.1
DQ Mixed 30.9
22% 27.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 85%
Volume0 300GB
253GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 125 127 125 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 125
Write 96.1
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 125
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
214% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 118%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD050 500GB
242GB free, PID 0408
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 22 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 27.1
Write 23
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 22.9
30% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 44%
Sony Storage Media 32GB
29GB free, PID 09c2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 11 8.1 8.1 8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
9.48% Terrible
Read 27.1
Write 12.8
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 10.6
18% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.3
85% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.48%
Great: 25%
Kingston DT 100 G2 8GB
5GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 2.8 2 2.4 2.5 2.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 7.2
Mixed 3.2
SusWrite 2.3
8% 7.1 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
18% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M... 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.8% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 16.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback