Lenovo 90JB005GUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90JB005GUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36EF
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170927
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateDec 08 '18 at 16:00
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 89.7
1-Core 125
2-Core 245
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 723
76% 607 Pts
64-Core 730
45% 730 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
MSI(1462 3510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2077 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
32.5% Below average
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 39
32% 37.2 fps
MRender 43.1
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 37.5
33% 40.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000L1 128GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L1QCXB7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,727
Write 729
Mixed 579
220% 1,012 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 75.5
262% 91.7 MB/s
DQ Read 887
DQ Write 813
DQ Mixed 734
583% 812 MB/s
Poor: 93% Great: 213%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
893GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 172 171 175 175 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 156
Mixed 105
SusWrite 174
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5110ME78HAF-2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
86% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 24.7
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 26.3
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90JB005GUS Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Lenovo 90JB005GUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback