Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD3P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55A-UD3P  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '18 at 23:26
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 141
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 283
38% 282 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
XFX(1682 2992) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 10% Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$79
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 122 120 124 124 113 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46% Average
Read 227
Write 193
Mixed 194
SusWrite 119
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 27.3
88% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.7
DQ Write 65.3
DQ Mixed 31.1
28% 40 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 46%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
466GB free
Firmware: AD14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 98 96 97 97 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 104
Write 13.6
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 95.7
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 59%
ASMT 2105 3TB
801GB free, PID 1053
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 114 113 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
49% Average
Read 124
Write 111
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 112
118% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 49%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55A-UD3P Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD3P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $320
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback