PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Intel Thurley |
Motherboard | Mainboard X58 (all builds) |
Memory | 0.4 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170513 |
Uptime | 3.3 Days |
Run Date | Dec 07 '18 at 04:30 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 39% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
|
65.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX300 1TB-$90
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 209 218 226 206 143 MB/s
|
39.8%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$63
535GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 69 69 67 68 MB/s
|
41.4%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
20%
Very poor
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples | 7x |
Xeon L5640IntelBench 66%, 592 samples | 3x |
Core i7 X 990Intel $499Bench 78%, 4,994 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples | 2x |
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 1x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 38% - Below average | Total price: $175 |