Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 480 16,023 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Memory 66.4 1-Core 77.5 2-Core 150 57% 98.1 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 194 26% 193 Pts	64-Core 194 12% 194 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M 3,013 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 1532) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	2.68% Terrible	Lighting 3.17 Reflection 3.88 Parallax 1.78 3% 2.94 fps	MRender 5.05 Gravity 3.53 Splatting 2.48 3% 3.69 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.68% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 145GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 129 29 107 136 101 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.5% Poor	Read 202 Write 183 Mixed 164 SusWrite 111 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 7.2 28% 7.67 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 HP594908-HR1-ELD 4GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	26.1% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 11.1 26% 8.97 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6.8 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	25x
GeForce GT 425MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,013 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
SD720 256GBTranscendBench 74%, 312 samples	2x
U100 252GBSandiskBench 35%, 177 samples	2x

RAM
SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 2x2GBAsintBench 27%, 888 samples	13x
EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 2x2GBUnknownBench 27%, 1,533 samples	4x
99U5428-040.A01LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 421 samples	2x

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $158