HP Pavilion Gaming Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80A9
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160725
Uptime19 Days
Run DateDec 05 '18 at 18:19
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 92
2-Core 188
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 361
48% 356 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
HP(103C 80A9) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1722
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 16.8
18% 18.2 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 15.8
13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-000H1 128GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT21H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 58 62 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 443
Write 68.3
Mixed 98.5
SusWrite 58.5
36% 167 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 16.5
72% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 23.9
DQ Mixed 31.7
40% 74.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 59%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
662GB free
Firmware: JA0OA710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 89 91 90 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 90.6
Write 89.3
Mixed 34
SusWrite 89.5
55% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ81UG8EFU0-GN-F Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 19.3
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 19.8
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Notebook Builds (Compare 710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback