Lenovo 20208

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20208  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20208
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime28.3 Days
Run DateDec 05 '18 at 00:21
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2020M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 83.3
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 133
56% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 132
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5002) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.75% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 1.38
2% 1.66 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.52
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.75%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH2ZB550
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 118
Write 65
Mixed 21.8
50% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 72%
SanDisk Cruzer Switch 8GB
1GB free, PID 5572
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 20.3
Write 3.5
Mixed 8.5
11% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2
124% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
SHARETRONIC Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.9% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13.9
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20208 Builds (Compare 272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20208

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback