Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '16 at 23:49
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 139
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 267
34% 255 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
Gigabyte(1458 22BD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.200.1025.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 89.5
52% 72.4 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 56.6
Splatting 81
56% 66.5 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$33
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 412
Write 110
Mixed 153
49% 225 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 10.9
76% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 84.5
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 24.4
39% 74.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 73%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
953GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 40
Write 39.6
Mixed 40.6
30% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.16
60% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 84%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
514GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 86.9
Write 54.5
Mixed 62.2
51% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.09
4K Write 0.11
4K Mixed 0.07
13% 0.09 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 59%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
3TB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 127
Write 101
Mixed 91.5
131% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.11
4K Write 6.51
4K Mixed 0.5
243% 2.71 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C11D3/4GX KHX2133C11D3/4GX KHX2133C11D3/4GX 133C11D3/4GX 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.8% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 17.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 12.2
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback