Gigabyte GA-B250M-DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte B250M-DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B250M-DS3H  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '18 at 22:34
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 192
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 390
52% 390 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.86% Terrible
Lighting 6.17
Reflection 9.15
Parallax 6.22
5% 7.18 fps
MRender 7.62
Gravity 5.37
Splatting 12.9
8% 8.62 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.86%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX3 60GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 78 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 324
Write 80.3
Mixed 127
SusWrite 75.7
33% 152 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 32.2
130% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 80.9
DQ Mixed 89.5
68% 91.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
234GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 166 167 168 167 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 159
Mixed 81
SusWrite 167
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
351GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 93 94 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 86.7
Write 86.4
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 85.3
57% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 62%
USB DISK 32GB
22GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2 3.7 5.4 4.2 5.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
4.05% Terrible
Read 19.3
Write 2.5
Mixed 12
SusWrite 3.9
11% 9.43 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.05%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 11.6
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B250M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 4,683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250M-DS3H - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback