Lenovo 2349GCG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 2349GCG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2349GCG
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170131
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateDec 04 '18 at 15:03
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 79.2
2-Core 148
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 211
29% 213 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.92% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.85
Parallax 3.03
4% 4.43 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.39
5% 5.21 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.92%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 140 138 136 138 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 445
Write 425
Mixed 344
SusWrite 171
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 20.8
81% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 336
254% 340 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HTS725032A7E630 320GB-$89
144GB free
Firmware: GHBZB550
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 65 65 65 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 59.7
Write 79.5
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 64.8
40% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8C-PB Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2349GCG Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2349GCG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback