Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '18 at 01:18
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 242
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 798
80% 648 Pts
64-Core 986
61% 986 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 148
Parallax 127
111% 137 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 135
Splatting 110
98% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 465 433 458 453 430 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 455
Mixed 386
SusWrite 449
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 49.1
169% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 331
256% 349 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
7GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 471
Write 390
Mixed 373
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 50.1
172% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 328
254% 348 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
51GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 117 119 120 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 92.8
Write 76.8
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 119
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
172% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 83%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
16GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 82 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 91.5
Write 77.9
Mixed 75
SusWrite 81.4
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 85%
Synology iSCSI Storage 537GB
489GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 96 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 99.9
Write 96.1
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 97.7
69% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 4.8
818% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 57%
WDC WD10 03FZEX-00MK2A0 1TB
10GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 122 119 120 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 121
Write 122
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 121
147% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
145% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB-$140
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 42
MC Write 50.9
MC Mixed 41.6
128% 44.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 21
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 114%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $686
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback