bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel D915PCY
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20050429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '18 at 22:04
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 93%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.20GHz
J2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Memory 35.1
1-Core 13.9
2-Core 22.3
17% 23.8 Pts
4-Core 20.5
8-Core 26.3
3% 23.4 Pts
64-Core 29.6
2% 29.6 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16% Very poor
Lighting 9.97
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 38.9
8% 21.7 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 36.6
31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 16%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 27 29 33 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 59
Write 54.7
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 24.3
33% 44.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24%
Great: 43%
WD WD10EVCS-63E0B0 1TB
214GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 52 49 48 48 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 71.8
Write 75.8
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 48.4
45% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 51%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
285GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 52 49 48 47 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 64.6
Write 54.3
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 48.4
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
391GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 31 31 37 28 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 53.7
Write 56.8
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 29.1
34% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x0.5GB
4 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
7.76% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.77 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 0.7
SC Mixed 0.4
1% 0.43 GB/s
Latency 226
18% 226 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.76%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback