Asus GRYPHON Z87

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus GRYPHON Z87  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '18 at 02:45
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 119
2-Core 216
83% 143 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 632
63% 511 Pts
64-Core 637
39% 637 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 361C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Lighting 33.7
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 40.1
27% 35 fps
MRender 42.3
Gravity 41.4
Splatting 34.8
32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 79 74 46 30 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
61% Good
Read 150
Write 160
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 61.8
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.4
419% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61%
Great: 112%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
19GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 62 45 35 23 9.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 70.5
Write 88.5
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 41.9
49% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 86%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1.5TB
548GB free
Firmware: 0412
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 70 69 69 67 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 64
Write 65.3
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 68.2
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 49%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB
45GB free
Firmware: 04.01G01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 52 51 53 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 60
Write 62.7
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 52.3
44% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 63%
WD Elements 500GB
136GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 68 68 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 76
Write 78.2
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 67.5
92% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 41%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 152 148 150 152 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
62% Good
Read 151
Write 155
Mixed 124
SusWrite 150
198% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
120% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 62%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.6
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GRYPHON Z87 Builds (Compare 656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus GRYPHON Z87 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $620
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback