HP EliteBook 2530p

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 2530p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30E1
Memory1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091208
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateDec 02 '18 at 17:21
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo L9400
Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 27.3
2-Core 52.2
35% 49.7 Pts
4-Core 51.3
8-Core 50.7
7% 51 Pts
64-Core 51.7
3% 51.7 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
HP(103C 30E1)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.36% Terrible
Lighting 0.43
Reflection 0.35
Parallax 0.47
0% 0.42 fps
MRender 0.38
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 0.52
0% 0.45 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.36%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK1629GSG 160GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PS110C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 24 24 26 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 31.5
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 24.1
20% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 22%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$22
172GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 76.7
Write 12.2
Mixed 46
SusWrite 79.2
40% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 61%
Seagate USB 3.0 Cable 750GB
510GB free, PID 5030
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.5 4.4 4.9 4.8 5.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.71% Terrible
Read 30.2
Write 3
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 4.6
10% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 6.71%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 4.6
15% 5.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 2530p Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP EliteBook 2530p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback