Fujitsu CELSIUS W510 POWER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W510 POWER  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3067-A1
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '18 at 13:12
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 189
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 436
48% 378 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1342 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.10.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 80.8
54% 71.8 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 63.1
Splatting 57.1
51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 96 63 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 454
Write 313
Mixed 316
SusWrite 116
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 27.3
108% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 174
157% 235 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60
698GB free
Firmware: 3.AFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 69 73 72 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 74.3
Write 69.1
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 70.4
48% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 42%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
52GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 27 24 24 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 152
Write 48
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 37
90% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.6
136% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
50% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W510 POWER Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W510 POWER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback