Asrock B360M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B360M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '18 at 02:32
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-8600K-$259
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
1-Core 124
2-Core 251
88% 188 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 530
69% 509 Pts
64-Core 596
40% 596 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$170
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Lighting 199
Reflection 174
Parallax 189
51% 187 fps
MRender 148
Gravity 193
Splatting 150
52% 164 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
908GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 64 42 28 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 11
Write 28.5
Mixed 3.3
SusWrite 31.5
13% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 106%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
9GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.2 7.2 6.6 7.3 6.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
4.84% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 8
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 7
12% 9.35 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.84%
Great: 31%
ST350032 0AS 500GB
78GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 33 34 35 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.9% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 39.5
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 33
48% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLT8G4D26BFT4K.C8FD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 12.4
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 66.1
61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical B360M-HDV Builds (Compare 941 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock B360M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $434
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback