Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics84.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '18 at 01:33
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 143
2-Core 284
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 729
75% 605 Pts
64-Core 766
47% 766 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.3% Excellent
Lighting 99.6
Reflection 89.2
Parallax 158
81% 115 fps
MRender 89.3
Gravity 104
Splatting 129
90% 108 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 95 84 77 81 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 484
Write 65.2
Mixed 149
SusWrite 86.5
42% 196 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 17.2
99% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 33.2
60% 118 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 78%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
112GB free
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 96 96 90 92 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 495
Write 404
Mixed 375
SusWrite 132
78% 352 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 24.2
125% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 33.1
82% 168 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 78%
MD06400-NSDW-RO 640GB
595GB free
Firmware: 27.0CR.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 17 6.5 5.4 5.3 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 79
Write 13.3
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 8.7
24% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
62% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$50
220GB free
Firmware: 3.ADG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 72 72 72 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 72.5
Write 72.2
Mixed 39
SusWrite 71.7
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.1% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 20.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,915 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $639
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback