Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	92.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160411
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '18 at 20:30
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Memory 88.6 1-Core 116 2-Core 239 83% 148 Pts	4-Core 434 8-Core 732 71% 583 Pts	64-Core 907 56% 907 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6276) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 116 Parallax 100 96% 111 fps	MRender 99.3 Gravity 106 Splatting 106 85% 104 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 480GB 4,519 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: LSBG200 SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 335 165 125 117 117 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 434 Write 427 Mixed 370 SusWrite 213 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 81.1 4K Mixed 37.4 127% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 298 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 241 201% 289 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 95%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB 2,523 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 21GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 34.8 Write 2 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 34.5 24% 19.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1 70% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 37%
Generic- Multi-Card 32GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 25GB free, PID 0309 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 22.5 Write 11.2 Mixed 14.5 19% 16.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.1 137% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	98.6% Outstanding	MC Read 37.4 MC Write 43.2 MC Mixed 34.5 110% 38.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 18.2 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	765x
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	197x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	116x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	87x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	40x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16