Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.45 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 72.7 2-Core 149 63% 104 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 452 44% 363 Pts	64-Core 442 27% 442 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8598) CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2116 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	18.3% Very poor	Lighting 21 Reflection 23.1 Parallax 18.8 17% 21 fps	MRender 28.6 Gravity 20 Splatting 26.1 20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 88%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 362GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 240 270 266 204 190 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Read 456 Write 199 Mixed 405 SusWrite 241 73% 325 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 78.6 4K Mixed 45.5 142% 50.7 MB/s	DQ Read 283 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 17.6 81% 183 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 1600 CL9 Series F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 1600 CL9 Series 24GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	43.8% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 14.4 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 11.2 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	85x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	56x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	50x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $358