Acer Aspire E5-576G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E5-576G  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Ironman_SK
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170721
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateDec 01 '18 at 17:36
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 82
2-Core 155
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 230
31% 233 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 121A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6195
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.7% Terrible
Lighting 6.23
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 5.75
5% 7.37 fps
MRender 4.57
Gravity 5.57
Splatting 13.1
7% 7.74 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.7%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$38
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1025F8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 242 176 153 213 224 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 457
Write 22.7
Mixed 187
SusWrite 198
47% 216 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 40.8
137% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 256
204% 281 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 86%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KBGR/8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.5
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-576G Builds (Compare 1,129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-576G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback