Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180907
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '18 at 15:11
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	57%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 74.2 1-Core 102 2-Core 223 73% 133 Pts	4-Core 399 8-Core 686 66% 542 Pts	64-Core 939 58% 939 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1500 MHz, MLim: 2249 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.3 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	55% Above average	Lighting 67.8 Reflection 76 Parallax 98.6 55% 80.8 fps	MRender 59 Gravity 76.7 Splatting 63.9 54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 284 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 318GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 311 320 326 331 344 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Read 433 Write 374 Mixed 290 SusWrite 326 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 88.9 4K Mixed 36.5 140% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 289 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 238 188% 260 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$84 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 18GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 129 131 137 132 134 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	77% Very good	Read 136 Write 124 Mixed 69 SusWrite 132 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 109GB free Firmware: MX4OAC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 164 162 164 162 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 183 Mixed 32 SusWrite 163 101% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 108%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$86 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 24GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 100 89 101 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 100 Write 99.5 Mixed 52 SusWrite 98.6 64% 87.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 88%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB 44,506 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 170GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 139 138 140 137 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 137 Write 128 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 138 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 104%
Generic Mass-Storage 8GB 1,181 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 6GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 5.1 4.4 5.2 4.7 5.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	4.03% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 1.7 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 4.8 7% 6.82 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.03% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D34AEEAK.K8FB 2x8GB 546 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 44.1 MC Write 39.7 MC Mixed 35.8 114% 39.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.9 SC Write 32.8 SC Mixed 26.6 77% 27.1 GB/s	Latency 92.1 43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $636

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)