Asus P8B75-V

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-V (all builds)
Memory	2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20121011
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '18 at 09:11
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2100-$49 63,701 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	53.1% Above average	Memory 80.9 1-Core 60.7 2-Core 109 53% 83.6 Pts	4-Core 147 8-Core 166 20% 157 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT 27,834 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(0000 0000) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	1.78% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 4.08 Parallax 0.75 2% 2.28 fps	MRender 3.71 Gravity 1.43 Splatting 2.52 2% 2.56 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.78% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 525ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 73 58 65 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 93.2 Write 72.1 Mixed 50.4 SusWrite 66.3 16% 70.5 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 31.4 4K Mixed 14 53% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 23.5 DQ Write 61.6 DQ Mixed 27.2 25% 37.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 122 Write 123 Mixed 69.7 78% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,268 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 9GB free, PID b206 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 58 58 60 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	Read 49.5 Write 59.8 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 58.6 66% 48.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-020.A00LF 8GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.7% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 8.3 25% 8.73 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 8.9 25% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 78.9 51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-V Builds (Compare 1,152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-V

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	228x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	149x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	88x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	89x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	69x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	59x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	44x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	39x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $45Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	28x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	21x
1600 CL9 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 7,092 samples	18x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $442

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369