MSI Z87-G45 GAMING (MS-7821)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7821
MotherboardMSI Z87-G45 GAMING (MS-7821)  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '18 at 08:11
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 96.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 202
81% 138 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 587
61% 493 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85%
Great: 78%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.2% Below average
Lighting 40.5
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 38.4
33% 36.9 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 36.7
31% 37.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 33%
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
MSI(1462 2382) 1GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.12% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.41
1% 1.02 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 1.27
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 1.12%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
292GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 308 312 311 298 299 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 449
Mixed 426
SusWrite 309
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 51.1
189% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 342
261% 353 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 112%
Great: 129%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB
71GB free
Firmware: 03.03V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 91 81 80 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 108
Write 104
Mixed 75
SusWrite 85.7
69% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 68%
Seagate FreeAgent 1.5TB
309GB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 43 43 43 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 41.3
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 42.4
51% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 20%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
7TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 155 149 157 148 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 149
Write 156
Mixed 108
SusWrite 154
192% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.2
210% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1400 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.6% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 22.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 22.4
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 53.1
75% 53.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-G45 GAMING (MS-7821) Builds (Compare 4,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI Z87-G45 GAMING (MS-7821) - $242

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $654
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback