HP h8-1534

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemHP h8-1534  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte 2AC8
Memory4.7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121203
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 30 '18 at 00:33
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$55
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 71
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 113
52% 84.2 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 226
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7570
Device(1B0A 90BD) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.26% Terrible
Lighting 6.93
Reflection 6.81
Parallax 5.69
6% 6.48 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 5.23
Splatting 5.57
4% 5.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN1 1.5TB
512GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 89 64 51 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 139
Write 119
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 81.1
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 97%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
57GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 18 19 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 27.8
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 19.1
35% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.6
102% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT325U6EFR8C-PB M378B5273DH0-CK0 10GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.2% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 10.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 11.3
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1534 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1534

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback