Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X79-UD3  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '18 at 08:14
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 709
72% 581 Pts
64-Core 868
54% 868 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1385 MHz, MLim: 2050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.11.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Lighting 74.7
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 79.3
61% 74.8 fps
MRender 74.5
Gravity 73.2
Splatting 62.5
57% 70.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$79
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 415
Write 269
Mixed 300
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 21.9
73% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 184
167% 256 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 91%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
7GB free
Firmware: MU02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 506
Write 355
Mixed 328
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 13.9
100% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 195
167% 242 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 103%
WD WD15EZRX-00DC0B0 1.5TB
192GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 159
Write 22.2
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 33.5
45% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 83%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
217GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 197 200 200 181 201 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 162
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 196
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.2
395% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 112%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB
714GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 101 101 102 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 105
Write 47.2
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 100
100% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 43%
ASMT 2105 500GB
63GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 184 184 156 97 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 170
Write 156
Mixed 97.9
SusWrite 150
191% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
145% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 159%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
65GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 7.2 13 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.11% Terrible
Read 1.7
Write 2.7
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 12
7% 4.47 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
79% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 8.11%
Great: 45%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
479GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 32.1
Write 14.7
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 20.8
31% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2133 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 36
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 52.1
77% 52.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X79-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 - $380

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $573
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback