HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 169B
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '18 at 22:28
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3530MX APU
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 38.9
2-Core 73.8
39% 59.3 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 127
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6620G
HP(103C 169B) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.17% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 3.04
Parallax 2.16
2% 2.6 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.83
Splatting 3.26
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.17%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU 650 480GB
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 193 193 150 224 189 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.9% Average
Read 264
Write 185
Mixed 236
SusWrite 187
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 13.6
46% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 14.3
56% 121 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-040.A01LF Ramaxel RMT3020EC58E9F1333 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.5% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion g6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback