bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DH61HO
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '18 at 09:43
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2010-$40
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 89.1
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 149
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 153
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Zotac(19DA 5158) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.17
Reflection 2.23
Parallax 0.44
1% 1.28 fps
MRender 2.62
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.74
1% 1.71 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 76 54 61 58 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.7% Above average
Read 251
Write 235
Mixed 213
SusWrite 83.1
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 24.7
96% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 92.4
DQ Mixed 91.5
80% 122 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 82%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
11GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 10 11 11 10 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 27.1
Write 7.8
Mixed 12
SusWrite 10.7
17% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
66% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback