PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z77 Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120904 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 26 '18 at 18:28 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 41% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
66.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-$140
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
18.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Plextor M5 Pro 256GB-$100
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 294 294 264 304 295 MB/s
|
67.2%
Good
|
|||
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
106GB free
Firmware: CP100-13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 60 59 59 59 MB/s
|
35.2%
Below average
|
|||
JetFlash Transcend 64GB
28GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 15 14 15 15 MB/s
|
9.96%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
25.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 239x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 134x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 96x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 71x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 64x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 39x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $616 |