Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2H  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 26 '18 at 13:53
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 135
2-Core 266
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 771
81% 650 Pts
64-Core 769
48% 769 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 56 55 53 45 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 385
Write 200
Mixed 280
SusWrite 82.4
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 22.8
114% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 130
126% 194 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
172GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 64 64 112 83 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 117
Write 119
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 82.1
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 109%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$26
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 134 136 135 133 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 132
Write 128
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 134
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBD2 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 14.5
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2H Builds (Compare 2,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback